fix: deterministic reconciliation tooling and primary write lease#1203
Conversation
Inject a fixture repositoryRoot into preflight collection so the contract no longer scales with the live worktree farm (#67). Add a cooperative primary checkout write lease (#77) and a secret-safe atomic reconciliation evidence pack (#78), wired into lifecycle planning and the outstanding-issues ledger. Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 16 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (13)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
This pull request has been ignored for the connected project Preview Branches by Supabase. |
CI triageCI failed on this PR. Automated classification of the 2 failed job(s):
Compared with main CI run #5445 (success). Classification is evidence routing, not permission to ignore a failure. Exact quarantined Playwright identities remain governed by the flake ledger. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
Resolve package.json by retaining both this branch's reconciliation helpers and main's skill:create / branch:cleanup entries. Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
The merge commit retained both script sets but left Git conflict markers in the published package.json; strip them so the manifest parses again. Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
Append the squash merge SHA and cleanup proof for the reconciliation tooling PR after confirming two-dot tree equality with origin/main. Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com> Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary
RAG impact: no retrieval behaviour change — clamps non-finite/out-of-range similarity into [0,1] for scoring only; in-range scores, comparator key order, and release ranking are unchanged.
Verification
node scripts/run-vitest.mjs run tests/test-runner-safety.test.ts(17/17)node scripts/run-vitest.mjs run tests/database-skills.test.ts(4/4) andnpm run check:skillsnpm run verify:pr-localnot re-run after the latest merge; CI unit/static gates will re-validate on this head.npm run verify:uinot run in this cloud agent session.Risk and rollout
Clinical Governance Preflight
Clinical KB Database(sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy)Notes
PR_POLICY_BODY.mdexists so CI Sync PR policy body can write this description (agent token cannot edit the live PR body directly). Safe to delete after policy is green if you do not want the sync template retained.